It's that time of year when children get excited about the holidays and the judges gather in New York to try and figure out who is going to win the much coveted PR Week Awards. For the second time now I'm one of those judges and for the second time I have to trawl through a huge binder full of submissions. It is a tough job - not least because of the volume of submissions. It reminds me how an editor must feel when he gets a mountain of press releases to read to see if any is worthy of a news item.
Let me be very clear. There are some great pieces of work covered in the entries. Sadly when you have a binder full to read it's hard to make sure you give all the entries the attention they probably deserve. Instead you start to develop a system, whereby you look to make sure everyone has included basic items like measurement. Sadly even some of the good campaigns seem not to have covered such a basic item properly. I also looked to see if anyone actually took the trouble to justify why they chose the strategies and tactics they selected. Again most seemed not to bother. Using these and a few other criteria I was able to select my top two or three entries. While my approach to the task was solid enough, I would say that I'd really encourage people entering these awards to try and put themselves in the shoes of the judges before they even bother to start writing the entry. I couldn't help be reminded when reading some entries of resumes I'd seen over the years from people who clearly didn't know what the job was but had applied all the same just in case.
I would like to say that judging the entries was fun. It wasn't. People had crammed so much content onto two sides of paper it took an age to read them all and 'entry fatigue' was definitely setting in by the last few in the pile. So next year when it's award time again, give a little thought to the poor judges and try and think of what would help you give the submission a high score if you were a judge.
Of course I can't reveal what category I'm judging or who my chosen few were. That said I'm one of several judges for the category so my votes my end up being irrelevant anyway. All will be revealed when the awards are made in March. Let's just hope the other judges stayed the course and managed to get through all those entries. After all, buried in that pile of entries are some good campaigns that truly do deserve awards.
Wednesday, December 08, 2004
And the award goes to...
Friday, November 12, 2004
The serious side of PR
Last night Text 100 held a party in San Francisco to show off its new offices in Maiden Lane. These are impressive premises for a business that only opened its doors in this part of the world in the late 90s. But then this is the agency that can boast IBM, Cadence, NEC, Xerox, FujiFilm and Earthlink as clients. So they you'd expect them to located in great space right? Well such premises would have been cost prohibitive only a few years ago. Indeed it may seem sad to say but the cost of accommodation has been one of the major drivers of the success and failure of te PR agency business in the last few years. I know of at least three firms that went out of business because greedy landlords had pushed them into office rents their businesses couldn't support. If I look at the San Francisco market as an example, relatively small firms were being asked to pay $80-90/sq ft only three years ago. Today that same space is a mere $25/sq ft - and you'll likely get all the office furniture you'll ever need thrown in. What does all this mean and why have I taken the trouble to write about it? Well it means that the fiscal fundamentals of running a PR business are starting to come back into line. First came salaries, which like rent had been out of control. This bodes well for the sector and should mean that PR professionals will be able to run much better businesses. That is until the next economic bubble bursts - which hopefully isn't for a very long time! Until then the Text 100 staff are going to work in one of the coolest spaces in the city, something that would have been unthinkable only a short while ago.
Thursday, November 11, 2004
Winter? But it feels like Spring already
Winter has come early to Silicon Valley, at least in terms of the weather. The normally blue skies have been replaced by a more Seattle like gray. Of course winter in this part of the world is traditionally a short affair. By March people can feel quite confident that their morning latte can be consumed outside. While winter weather has arrived a little sooner than expected, spring like conditions appear to have come early to the tech PR industry. Agencies are once again hiring as new business opportunities abound and client spending rises.
Such conditions have not been the norm in the last few years. Indeed the market has been heavily in favor of the client. Knowing agencies needed the work clients have been able to place high demands on their external teams. That balance of power has, however, started to shift. While it would be unhealthy for a service industry like PR to dictate to clients, it is nice to see a more balanced relationship starting to develop between clients and their consultancies.
Of course this improvement in market conditions for agencies is not to be unexpected. Sales of the major tech firms have been on the rise, taking with them the marketing budgets of these businesses. At the same time VCs have been starting to pump large amounts of money into a wide range of startups - much of which needs to be used to get them recognized by the market. Of course not everyone is benefiting. In recent weeks I've heard on the grapevine that Fitzgerald is closing down its local office and that Golin Harris's tech business is down to less than a handful of people (if this information is wrong please let me know and I'll happily update the piece). Such was the strength of the downturn that we can expect some players to continue to suffer even as things improve.
Of course the PR industry still has some way to go to get back to the position it held in the late 90s. But I think on reflection most PR agency heads would now admit that they've learned some great lessons through these last few years and that they are now running much better businesses. If I look at my own businesses (Text 100 and Bite) I know for sure that we have a better list of clients and a better group of consultants to support them. We are also much more aware of the need to stay focused on what the client really needs and not be distracted by the corporate vanity that had started to creep in just before the downturn.
Anyway, as an Englishman I can't wait for the rain clouds to go - I lived under clouds just like these for far too long. But I hope that when they do, the spring-like conditions in the PR industry don't go with them.
Such conditions have not been the norm in the last few years. Indeed the market has been heavily in favor of the client. Knowing agencies needed the work clients have been able to place high demands on their external teams. That balance of power has, however, started to shift. While it would be unhealthy for a service industry like PR to dictate to clients, it is nice to see a more balanced relationship starting to develop between clients and their consultancies.
Of course this improvement in market conditions for agencies is not to be unexpected. Sales of the major tech firms have been on the rise, taking with them the marketing budgets of these businesses. At the same time VCs have been starting to pump large amounts of money into a wide range of startups - much of which needs to be used to get them recognized by the market. Of course not everyone is benefiting. In recent weeks I've heard on the grapevine that Fitzgerald is closing down its local office and that Golin Harris's tech business is down to less than a handful of people (if this information is wrong please let me know and I'll happily update the piece). Such was the strength of the downturn that we can expect some players to continue to suffer even as things improve.
Of course the PR industry still has some way to go to get back to the position it held in the late 90s. But I think on reflection most PR agency heads would now admit that they've learned some great lessons through these last few years and that they are now running much better businesses. If I look at my own businesses (Text 100 and Bite) I know for sure that we have a better list of clients and a better group of consultants to support them. We are also much more aware of the need to stay focused on what the client really needs and not be distracted by the corporate vanity that had started to creep in just before the downturn.
Anyway, as an Englishman I can't wait for the rain clouds to go - I lived under clouds just like these for far too long. But I hope that when they do, the spring-like conditions in the PR industry don't go with them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)